Long articles should be split into a series, if possible -- each with a useful, short title. If this is impossible or undesirable, they can be maintained as a single article but split into segments (like splitting a chapter into pages, as opposed to splitting a book into chapters).
See, for the moment, Origins of the American Civil War, Isaac Newton (in depth);
In contrast, see, eg., History of the English penny, History of Brazil
The central difference I see b/t a long article and a collection of detailed subarts is just like the difference b/t a single 5-paragraph article, and 4 1-paragraph stubs linked from a central 1-paragraph overview. There are differences in tone, in level of background given (when you have separate arts, you need to give more background for each one; common abbreviations have to be reintroduced each time and cross-refs relinked, etc), and in thematic flow (you can refer back to previous elts of a long story in different ways...). +sj+
Where appropriate, I like long articles -- the 'related topics'/external links/bibliography/ appear once, as it should be; navigation can be low-key and elegant, with "forward/back" links at the bottom of every page, as in a long e-zine article; and external links to the article can all be redirected to the first page. Finally, it then makes sense to have a single TOC for the entire article. +sj+